Useful course which provides the student with several good tools but the quality of the video lectures is poor with the lecturer having to re-read mistakes. Also, the formulation of the quiz questions (where sometimes a double negative question is asked) is not conducive to a good learner experience.

Weeks 1 and 4 were very hard to follow, not because they were difficult, but due to the presentation style. The optional quizzes popped in before the thoughts were concluded. Many test questions and answers for these two weeks were poorly worded. I would prefer a style that enhances retention.

The course doesn't provide too much information. It is based in a book you should have to follow the contents in the course. Contents are not too much developed in the videos. I miss more implication from the teachers to explain concepts and provide examples and analogies.

The offered course is really simple and easy to understand. Having said that, I have had experienced in-depth courses on the same topic on other online course platforms at a cheaper price. So, Overall not satisfied with the value for money.

Week 2 with mathematical tests and practices was the most useful and memorable one to me. other topics were just presented briefly with little examples and therefore won't stay in mind for long.

Was a bit harder to follow and the stats sections need updating. There were some errors in the quiz sections and the narrative on the videos could have been more engaging and descriptive.

The content on the slides from professor Cook was not inline to what he was speaking. There were topics on the slide which were not discussed in details.

There are a lot of tools that were mentioned in this course but weren't given a proper or more in depth explanation than it should have.

This course does not take 4 weeks, especially if you don't have access to the reading material. 3-4h are enough to complete it.

An e-book should have been provided and the lectures can be some better. It is not so engaging.

you need in this part more clarifications and practical examples to make it more easier for us

I really didn´t like the 1st and 4th week professor. The overall its ok.

Subtitles were not matching and method of presentation can be improved

Doesnt provide the textual material; the subtitles are offsync

some subscript are not in the same speed with the video.

The statistic section should have more visual examples.

lecture is monotonous. student cant easily drift.

A lot of words in the presentation.

too superficial, little practice

I think more detail was required

not my favorite subject

Too easy.

Good

Not very structured, too theoretical and not interactive at all. As want to get maximum knowledge of time I spend here I had to read again their sophisticated formulations, try to get the most important points - and it is very boring and not easy. A quiz is usually helping to search the answers and to repeat the material - here it is not the case as the answers are too obvious and stupid. What a shame

The course relies too much on reading the book. Which is not why we took the course. If we wanted to read the book we could've.

The instructors' presentations are very vague and all they do is just read what's written there... There is no practical assignments or hands-on training.

Overall, the course and the specialization is very weak.