KS
Sep 2, 2019
All the concepts were well explained and this course was perhaps the best I have found for RL.Great efforts have been put into making the course and It goes well in line with the suggested textbook.
MN
Apr 12, 2024
The concepts may sound confusing in the beginning, but as you go forward you find it interesting and understanding. I suggest you completely read the reading assignments before watching the videos.
By Marju P
•Jul 30, 2021
The course was disappointing for two reasons: poor instruction and poor content. I was expecting a high quality course from Coursera, but was instead finding myself with instructors that simply read a textbook to you. The instructors did not provide any added value. They read the book, even used the exact same examples and slides as in the book. Moreover, this was done in a a boring monotone way. The instructors seemed frozen still, eyes glazed over (with boredom?) with the exception of their lips that moved as they read the slides. Good instruction includes giving more value than just reading a book: new and different examples, different explanations, or at least different wording, personal commentary, sharing own intuition, and linking material to the broader world, making connections between ideas. All of this was missing. Furthermore, the course is not inclusive. The few examples that were chosen were applications to chess and golf. In other words, activities of the privileged few. RL is highly relevant in our world where AI solutions are springing up in all areas of life. There is a wealth of examples that are relatable to a wide variety of people. Instead, by choosing golf and chess, the instructors are alienating the majority of their students. This is in stark contract to Coursera's own mission of expanding and promoting access to high quality education for ALL people regardless of their background (including socio-economic background). The course could be improved by adding content (commentary, explanations, examples, discussions) that has not appeared in the book. Relating this content in a student friendly manner (not monotonically reading slides). In short, the instructors should follow the basics of modern provably effective teaching practices.
By Hung N
•Oct 9, 2023
The videos are most likely talk about the content in the book without any extra value in explanation. For me, it took a lot of effort to read the book, refers other resources to understand the content.
By Vinh Q T
•Aug 29, 2023
Not recommended. Lack of depth and programming examples so it's easy to forget what I have studied.
By Marc G
•Aug 24, 2023
Programming on week 1 is excessively complicated and unrealistic in terms of timing
By Jeon,Hyeon C
•Apr 6, 2021
등록 취소가 안되서 1점 드립니다.